Difference Between Maizemeal And Cornmeal

Tumbalá, criminal and cowardly

Fernández Noronha: quarrelsome under suspicion.

Political File

Angel Mario Ksheratto

Yesterday, acomedida line painted "white" so-called balance semanasantero in Chiapas. Understood then that there was no bloodshed in any of their traditional ways. This is what gives the term "white balance" zero crime, zero accidents and contrasting ... But as is common, yesterday in the pages of only two of the media surveyed, on par with the great note of the "white balance "we find information about the hijacking of a truck driver, capturing a gang of criminals, the case of drowning in Villa Las Rosas, the dead man in a rollover accident in Pijijiapan, the arrest of a trucker with illegal machete man Villaflores Finally, opposite the famous "white balance."
(Remember that any cover of a newspaper that eight columns are read to Tuxtla Gutierrez, was "the safest city in the country" and called tickers and children, the newspaper dripped blood was in the days when bad governed the city, Jaime Esposito Waltz.)
But the fact of removing the white blood to the balance of Easter, is the brutal beating Tumbalá Mayor, hit a citizen who was handcuffed, tied his feet and lying on the ground, all a man with his pants right place, yes sir! Indeed, this same mayor has been accused of beating his girlfriend in public places, with pistol in hand. Barracote! Macho!
According to witnesses the bloody deed, Porfirio Ramos Torres, the chief councilor, in a complete state of intoxication and, "depending on the language of some of his buddies who was accompanied powder-Pasadita expensive, encountered in the stretch of highway Tumbalá- Sombra Grande, with a vehicle which was moved Simón López Luna, accused of rape. Ramos Torres, pistol in hand and with their drinks under his belt is believed the fourth of the Powerpuff Girls, without a word, without asking what he was being accused López Luna, or where rural police took him, ordered him to get out.
With the grip of their frightening gun, beat him until he fell unconscious to the ground, where it remains kicked and beaten with a piece of branch and finally with his own belt, which by the way, stole the brave mayor. Once satisfied his criminal instinct, Ramos Torres asked for more alcohol and sat down to see how the victim was writhing in pain and was bleeding. One of his accomplices, Manuel Torres (indeed, their family, confirming the nepotism) Public Works Director Tumbalá finally asked why they had arrested what Simon Lee Luna.
He explained that he had been falsely accused of rape of Maritza Guzman Alvaro, denied being the perpetrator.
In Shadow Grande, where the community was moved, López Luna had reached a "compromise" with the alleged victim and her mother, paid 3 thousand dollars to avoid being transferred to the municipal and of course, be in freedom. The women took the money, is shared between them and the municipal judge who issued the penalty, Pedro López Velasco, and anyway, they decided to keep him in prison. In the course of the transfer, they found the criminal mayor.
Simón López Luna, lost one eye, has serious internal injuries and his family feared that a sudden, death. Yes, and it read: Your situation is extremely serious and the worst is that man is without proper medical care. Moreover, his family has been receiving death threats from the same Porfirio Ramos Torres, in the sense that if you continue to be reported, he personally will kill the whole family.
The matter is serious, very serious. A mayor murderer, criminal, an armed individual who walks down the street, hitting one who he wants and what is worrying, wearing a badge that gives immunity and degree of power that grants impunity. The subject in question is not the first After incurring criminal acts. Even before he was involved in a couple of kidnappings of government officials, but by things of impunity and influence, was free ... free to continue committing crimes. And here are the results.
Will there be justice? Do you punish a criminal justice system? Hopefully not. For the sake of Chiapas and the justice, that offender must be punished, not doing so would set a bad, very bad precedent. Cardholder



*** Except unfortunate cases like the above, the other, the issue of tourism in Chiapas semanasantero, rose by 17 percent the number of visitors. It is, as the president Juan Sabines Guerrero, a rising line that will be monitoring to see what its future consolidation. *** I have at home two boxer dogs, when they fight, just a snap to separate. Unfortunately, among priests and PRD, that can not be achieved. Followers of BAD and that diputadito clown (Fernández Larron) returned to get to the Cathedral of Mexico City has done its scandal. All because one or two nosy priest, has not kept his mouth shut and has affected the interests of BAD and gang. Or who RIEF. As few as the other clowns. *** Yesterday was killed the controversial Jorge Diaz Serrano, during the glory years of corrupt, director PEMEX. For this reason, he was in jail, accused of defrauding the company, during the presidency of José López Portillo. Many are the secrets that Diaz Serrano is carried to the grave. *** Go mad the "Tigesito." And won a multimillion-dollar fine for his opponent Telcel and put to jail yesterday to his stepmother, ex-wife of "Tigesote." *** What dictatorship formerly of the order of presentation has to answer for embezzlement committed by the tyrant Paul Abner Salazar? *** By the way, a few days ago we learned that the tyrant in question held a meeting "work" in Mexico City attended by two or three of Pabloism outdated seeking the return of the gang and also two political learners with links to organized crime. Greg Sanchez, former mayor of Cancun and designated serious crimes, organized from his cell, encounter. Go! Is not that thunder pistol? And no one doubts that the famous Peje (BAD), will promote the candidacy of Paul Abner in the PT. *** Then we read. Amksheratto@hotmail.com

ksheratto@gmail.com

<$BlogFeedsVertical$>

<$BlogItemFeedLinks$>

How Much Does A 50 Ft Ethernet Cable Cost

Look NEXT TIME WELL WHO casts

.


That debt is a story, at least as is measured.
a couple of months ago I saw the paperwork to enter a type of municipality. If a packet of pages, if a folder ... it was nothing. The seller, who was the owner, took out a note, so long that it was must have been almost a year.
"Tell your boss that you pay what we should
must be very stressful to work in a council or government office and the boss asks you to go looking for anything to the nearest store.
I recently attended a rifi-raphe between the restaurant owner and manager of the finance council. The first was shouting because the council wanted to collect a tax surcharge, when he still had the binge of the last six months, including seafood platters.
Lamps, light bulbs, pens, computers, ... to the toilet paper, soap and bleach, metalwork, chairs ... I owe everything, absolutely everything.
The PP de Catalunya also be a fortune, any payment must be approved by central Madrid. Centralist hardened, but not both. What happens, they say, is that the PPC has no money, no government in any city hall and, of course, can not suck and need to Madrid.
That's debt, although not leave exposed in the accounts. There is only one way
to put the batteries: no fiarles anything, so spend at the collection and not what your system needs.
For them not to worry. Not pay the builder that has fixed the water leak, the electrician will set up the hall, they organized the computer system to collect fines. Their employees to recover or not is not your problem. Who can not pay your child's nasal surgery, the prosthetic knee of his wife ... "and that from now on the waiting list for that crap in public health will be two or three years-not his problem. They charged at the time, there's no doubt, and all have private insurance, not to mention that the manager of the clinic will look off and they do not miss anything, lest they endanger the reclassification to the park and help to renew the resonance apparatus. If they do not Fiama
more, one of two things come into collapse or learn to manage.

Needless to banking, this is the only remedy left to the ciudadanito half, because if we expect the State to put in place, we enforce the same laws as the rest of us, we Aviados.
We must find new ways of financing and saving more honest, neighborhood associations, communities of stairs ... are a good choice. The procedure to those organizations manage our credit unions distributed among neighbors. A new TV, a car ... small purchases first, then the largest. First a small fee, after all the money you have in the bank, which gives you a pittance in return for taxes, commissions, of problems.
banking should only serve as an international intermediary, preferably state-owned. If Spain does not have sought French, German ... So simple and so our leaders smart.
for me a few years ago and I use it less likely the bank. At first it seemed silly, childish, but with time and good management have been fine-tuning the system. Consumer
-tent-manufacturing-weaver-spinner ... always the same route, only had to organize it.
we first went to the weaving and shops, then e rest have been smart. Why
find more money if it is always running hand in hand? When you need it, the other to spare, you just have to speed up or slow collections, so the point that needs funding, it has no need to go to the bank.
Why use your billing system, if we were four, we know it and the seller makes collector? Strike

taxes. We set
stores to sell our product directly. It's easier to lower prices so it does not exit without having to wait for the shopkeeper has a right to do so. But not only that, with only one product can not have enough variety, so we exchange goods with other producers that have the same problem. No need for bills, notes only in late season condition and the outcome is settled, only that, almost no taxes, no banking movement ... not necessary.
If card charge is the same price, so the law dictates, but nobody forbids a discount to those who pay without it. At home you do is you want to.

In the shop, hairdresser, in the bar ... if not have sufficient capacity put a stereo. If you are lucky to have him, put royalty free music. There is enough and every day. Support smuggling buy it, do not have to pay royalties for something empty, so the State smart.

And finally, next time look closely at who you vote.

And now one of humor.
For those who do not understand English also worth visualize

.

What Is The Handle For On My Fireplace

immigration policy

File

Migrants crossing the Suchiate River.

Political

Angel Mario Ksheratto

The issue of human rights of migrants, has been hovering in the air for some weeks, about that matter, Chiapas has advantages over other states, has established a system of protection of the rights of migrants which includes a Special Prosecutor who until now has been heavily involved in curbing illegal activities. At the same time, have created specific laws that guarantee a dignified life in Chiapas.
Obviously, the advantage is greater still over immigration policy Mexican. Has been the practice of local government to meet the needs of the citizens of Central and South America and that is plausible, because it turns the state into one of the first to preserve the human dignity of those who go in search of so-called "American dream." Ideally, Chiapas immigration policy is spread throughout the country, especially in the route followed by travelers to the U.S. soil.
This hints to the government of Barak Obama recently suggested that the Mexican government tighten immigration controls at the borders between Mexico, Guatemala and Belize, under the guise of closing the passage to the drug. Knowing the position
Federal Government to the U.S. interference, we fear that migrants will be further victims of harassment and persecution, to what Chiapas immigration policy should be maintained and where possible, enhanced to give migrants always find a helping hand and generous. It is not violating federal law with respect to migration, but to address an issue that has to do with the rights of migrants and not to very specific interests of the United States government.
They, the gringos, they know their border, they can not therefore be push the boundaries and pressure the Mexican repress their blood brothers.
is now that the local policy regarding migrants should be considered and put in its proper place. First, because it is comprehensive and inclusive, and secondly, because it addresses the priority needs of migrants. We note that in protecting the rights of migrants, the impact has been positive in the countries of Central America, unfortunately, in other states, violence and abuse are daily practice we still embarrassing.
In contrast, in Chiapas, from 2008 to date, 23 bands of criminals that plagued migrants, have been dismantled, all this has led to the crime against them, has been reduced to 90 percent. Immigration security agenda, there would have been possible if there were no perfect coordination. This is an elementary part of the success that has, though, I must say frankly, there are still one or two who did not understand the policy in this regard.
In the same vein, unfortunately, some agents of the National Migration Institute, continue to apply violent and unconstitutional methods. A few days ago they learned of the deportation of a Mexican girl, who despite being fully identified, was expelled from the country and so far, no one knew if it came, because since his deportation, remained as missing.
is to explain that is not the State Government imposed repressive practices; to abuse of the immigration agents, the Federal Government has promised only that "debug" to the institution, but so far nothing has happened. Not long ago, in Tenosique, Tabasco, the whole world witnessed how an agent of the INM, chased with a machete to a Honduran immigrant who nearly drowned in their attempt not to be assaulted by an official employee.
In short, Chiapas is setting an example to the world of how to treat migrants. Whoever does not want understand, simply and understands little or no values \u200b\u200band principles. Cardholder



*** Keep counting up: yesterday amounted to 146 dead bodies found in mass illegal in San Fernando, Tamaulipas. "Collateral Damage? *** On the fight against drug trafficking, several national newspapers yesterday reported the version offered by WikiLeaks where Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the U.S. government offered to get the army to patrol the streets to fight drug trafficking. This, during the last electoral campaign. According to the WikiLeaks 06México505 cable, then-presidential candidate asked the then U.S. Ambassador Tony Garza, approach the gringo government to grant financial assistance to Mexico, mainly to cover the costs of assistance programs populist implement thought to have won the elections. Curious, no? The enemy of the Americans, asking for money to fulfill their electoral tantrums. Hypocrite! *** By the way, La Jornada kept exits and no cable WikiLeaks published, although it has a special place to check each of the cables. *** From now on, no mass media ads can be promoted through human trafficking. This, the reform made yesterday in the Senate of the Republic to Articles 5 and 13 of Federal Law to Prevent and Punish Trafficking in Persons. The penalty for anyone who hires the advertising and publishing, will be 6 to twelve years in prison. *** Then we read. Amksheratto@hotmail.com

ksheratto@hotmail.com

<$BlogFeedsVertical$>

<$BlogItemFeedLinks$>

Rcpired Chicken Broth

Question 1


Image taken from: http://arami-reta.blogspot.com

Hello! I write again to the years here.

had not written about the referendum because it was not clear how to vote. Now that I've heard and read much, I can write something useful. We question by question, because I believe every one deserves a separate analysis. QUESTION 1

Do you agree to amend paragraph 9 of Article 77 of the Constitution incorporated a clause which prevents the expiration of preventive detention when it has been caused by the person on trial and allow penalize unreasonable obstacles in the administration of justice by judges, judges, prosecutors, experts or servers subsidiary bodies of the judiciary, as defined in Annex 1?

ANNEX 1

"The remand order will remain in effect if by any means the person has escaped processed, delayed, avoided or prevented their prosecution through acts designed to cause its expiration. If the delay occurs produced during processing or the expiration, be it by acts or omissions of judges, judges, prosecutors, public defenders, experts or servers subsidiary bodies, shall be deemed to have incurred these in a very serious offense and should be sanctioned under the law. "

What do we change?

Article 77 of the Constitution describes the basic guarantees that a person has been released from prison. For example No one can be saved without a written order from a competent authority, he must "read their rights" to the detainee (the typical "you have the right to remain silent, to call the defense with a lawyer and if you can not pay, the State will provide a "we hear in the movies), among other rights.

The No. 9. right now says that no person can be detained for more than 6 months (if the offense is punishable by imprisonment) or more than one year (if the offense is punishable by imprisonment, that is, if the offense is more serious):

CURRENT TEXT OF RULE CHANGE INTENDED

"Under responsibility of the judge or court hearing process, pretrial detention may not exceed six months in cases involving crimes punishable by imprisonment or one year in cases of offenses punishable by imprisonment. If you exceed these limits, the remand order would be void. "

I do not want to think about if we do not like or the government. Rather, ask yourself objectively, change, is useful or not? Is it safe or not? Utility

change

The expiration of custody there since 1998, the Constitution Sangolquí. It is good that preventive detention expires, because otherwise, a person could spend in prison all the time and not be judged. Many times people are left (before 1998) so much time in preventive detention equvialía or exceeded the time of the penalty itself. On more than one occasion, people who passed got saved for years after an acquittal. Some were American Court of Human Rights, that more than once said that Ecuador should put a limit on detention (can not be "indefinite.")

Needless to say that any country that respects DD.HH. American system, the remand prisons are limited. Therefore, the idea of \u200b\u200b"eliminating the expiration of custody" is not viable.

this in mind, the Assembly in 1998 set a limit for detention. The same limit was repeated in the 2008 Constitution. Since 1999 (which began to expire remand), the detainees began to leave because they have no ruling within the law. Since then, many detainees do not seek plead his innocence or eliminate indictments making the prosecution, but seek lengthen and delay the process until the deadline of pretrial detention and go free. According

, The Universe, a report Judicial Council in 2009 indicated that of 24,958 hearing is not held 6854: 2,280 for "legal tricks" 2299 did not specify the reason, 963 per problems of the Office; 820 the absence of witnesses, 321 per drawbacks of rehabilitation centers, 156 for the judiciary, and, 15 others.

To avoid these maneuvers, the Code of Criminal Procedure states that are not counted for the revocation, the days of delay were caused when by the accused or his counsel:

" Criminal Procedure Code. Article 169 .- Revocation of custody .- Pretrial detention may not exceed six months in cases involving crimes punishable by imprisonment or one year in cases punishable by imprisonment.

In both cases, the deadline for expiration will operate from the date it became effective on remand.

If these limits be exceeded, detention order shall be void, under the responsibility of the criminal investigating judge hearing the case.

When should exceed the time limits provided by the constitutional rules and the Code of Criminal Procedure and lapses of preventive detention, granting, as a result of freedom of who is in fact deprived of it, the Court of Criminal or Court of Criminal jurisdiction, necessarily and immediately sent complete record of each case to the National Judicial Council, a body to maintain an individual record of these facts.

If you can not be the adjudication hearing for failure of the accused, witnesses considered necessary for the resolution of the case, experts, interpreters or lawyers defending the accused, ie causes not attributable to the administration of justice, this absence suspended ipso jure the course of the deadlines set in this article until the date that is actually carried out the adjudication hearing. The foregoing is without prejudice to the trial record necessary for the suspension in each case by the corresponding secretary.

not be considered, therefore, has exceeded the limitation period of preventive detention when the defendant, by whatever means, has avoided, delayed, avoided or prevented their prosecution through acts designed to cause the expiration of the prison detention.

I mentioned in the preceding paragraphs includes unilateral actions of the accused or defendant when, with procedural unfairness or incidents causing delays the processing of the process not related to the right of objection to a resolution or statement, or deliberately violate the provisions of the criminal court or tribunal guarantees Guarantees criminal submitted to legally convened hearings and reported, indicating an intention to delay the normal development process to benefit from a future declaration of nullity.

In determining this period are not counted as time has elapsed between the date of filing of the objections and the date of issuance of the rulings on the challenges defendants only when they have been denied. Produced

revocation of pretrial detention, in the same order that the judge declare the criminal guarantees that the accused have become subject to regular reporting to the court of criminal securities and prohibited from leaving the country, or one of these measures if it considers sufficient to ensure the immediacy of processing with the process.

The obvious question is: if the law says and the time when the accused are not delay the trial, why do the same thing in the Constitution? Well, it happens that many judges comparing the text of the Constitution and the Penal Procedure Code and, as in the Constitution did not establish where the term Elapsed not apply the rule "more favorable to the accused" and let out the accused in a year (or six months) even though the accused himself had delayed the process.

is striking that in Cuenca, judges have left expire never a custody (or soon will be expired one or two), but in other cities, the most common prisons expire and least common are sentences. Why does this happen? There are many reasons but the main one is that the judges who let expire remand No risk: no the sanctions and in the few cases where no penalty is a small fine or suspension of work days (with pay!). Perhaps the Council of the Judiciary in Cuenca gets tougher sanctions or perhaps morlaco society morally sanction the judge to be negligent in their work. The question becomes more severe punishment for judges who let expire a remand. Danger



change

is said that the reform is spirit "Social Christian." In fact, the PSC has always been against the revocation of custody. In fact, after the Assembly of 1998, the PSC promoted legal reform in 2003 that created a figure called "detention firm" , by which a defendant remained imprisoned indefinitely even before receiving sentence. This mechanism was ruled unconstitutional in 2006 because it violated the 1998 Constitution, but Cinthya Viteri proposed in 2009 a similar figure, the "mandatory detention", which basically meant that a defendant be imprisoned indefinitely until sentencing.

has been argued that this reform, the detainees will remain detained indefinitely, or at least, that the limitation period will be longer, which impacts the protection rights of the accused.

believe that the only defendant who will be harmed will be the one who actually delay the process moves. Is it correct to remove the incentive to delay the trial. So vote Yes.

how you'll vote on this question?

To read more:
Text El Comercio newspaper that explains the question.
History custody since 1998 (and proposals to re Cynthia Viteri indefinite preventive detention).
Another blog that discusses this question.