wish for all I want for me: the freedom to act, to love, to think. Ie anarchy desire for all mankind
Scarfó America (1928 - Letter to Armand)
Scarfó America (1928 - Letter to Armand)
There is a beautiful event associated with Kafka I relate to the construction of ways of being-at the end of accounts, the subject of this brief work, and which says: "travel, sex and books are roads that lead nowhere, and yet are roads that have to penetrate and get lost to find or to find something, anything, a book, a gesture, a lost object, to find anything perhaps a method, hopefully, the new, what has always been there. "
As I believe there can be no division between life praxis and ideas, I'll start talking about me, because that forms part of what society would call" my private life "is actually a strong political commitment to the established order of things, which I hope will be destroyed at any time by the actions of other individuals like me. And beginning with the autobiographical tone because I think that we have not overcome the texts and the productions of scholars like Foucault or Butler Preciado about sexuality, but if it is time to put the body literally the case, and let to play the hidden sexuality, being as it is that the division by gender, qualification by gender expressions, and the exercise of sexuality that there is clear and "natural" are at least one of the pillars where the system is strongly supported playing the system we have today. However, my interest is not to prescribe how one should live in a future anarchist society, but try to find hic et nunc, from my own personal experience based on the intersection with other individuals, ways to subvert, dismantle and destroy the system as far as my concerns me (for taste) and more challenges me. I
Leonor. I have 32 years. I have sex with women from age 12, and males from the 15. I have three male lovers, and a female lover, not all these people live in my city, my longest relationship has been 8 years, and that person is the only one that I call family, and I want the other 3 also someday are, I think we walked to the affinity. And "I have" in this context means having a car, a house or a pair of slippers, it means giving my life (my body) to others with all our contradictions and weaknesses. These 4 people know about the others, some of them are known and are in turn love between them. Cojo
all I can, with any person who I like and want to catch me. And But those who know me know that I am anything but a friend of smiles, which Venus, kind or sympathetic. My idea is not released the girl always ready, but the activist who makes his shell a barricade because he knows that, in part, the vulva is one of the best things that get learned. Take to me is not just penetration, but being penetrated by the body, fists, dildos, vibrators, as well as penetrating my lovers is something we usually practice with extreme pleasure. We talked a lot about sex, fantasies and desires, as well as other policy issues around which the activists congregate. Whenever I can also try to have group sex (especially swingers nightclubs not) plus sadomasochistic practices of all kinds enjoy being sexually submissive or subjecting others with all manner of perversions, some of which include either pain or humiliation of some kind. I see sadomasochism as a work of art that is so much more exciting when it is prohibited. My practice S / M parody often politically hegemonic sexualities. Sadomasochism is the most extreme sexual experience: when sex becomes most purely sexual, the further away of love, anatomical reduction and romantic discipline. The S / M is the quintessence of sex without reproductive purposes: to create strange pleasure forms. Also explored enough exhibitionism and the sexualization of public space, and work on the citation deviant sexual conventions allows sexualized (and so resemantizing) such as jealousy (or does not it remains privately owned). Not my body or my sexuality, I feel shame, and masturbation and auto-eroticism is an excellent opportunity for my sex life. My life is like that of muchxs, full of contradictions to be overcome, but not double-talk, false consciousness, or hypocrisy.
not usually found in the anarchist movement (and only discuss otrxs ellxs because vegan activists and movements are even worse in regard to sexuality) or lovers or sex related, but That does not surprise me, not usually found in the anarchist movement, beyond some honorable exceptions, rather than playing themselves what they want to abolish, or were supposed to algunxs wanted: young married couples who had a child by an oversight, and now charge with that, long engagements with sexuality romanticoides unsatisfactory and where she always believed in a concept so slavish and restrictive for their own freedom and emancipation as "eternal love" and where he is able to say things like "we can do whatever you want but she does not realize the damage because "moralists of all kinds, all colors essentialist motherhood holding as a destination for women, couples unequal gender roles, penetrative sexual and reproductive functions, etc.
The picture is, to say the least, bleak. We're not even where we had left the anarchist Emma Goldman in the early past century reminds us that love can only be free, that love dies with the marriage, and if by some mystery survives after getting married, it was not the marriage. Of course Emma was referring to heterosexuals in a time where it was virtually impossible for a woman or a man, evade their civic and social responsibility to marry and enter, thus the system of capitalist production and reproduction which the anarcho-feminist opposed. And the reality is that today there is no longer much difference between going through the church or registry office and living with family ties faux marriage, but we want self-deceiving. In fact the couple, even a couple who freely choose to be mutual and state-blessed - as I thought Emma Goldman would be the link between two human beings who love, "is an institution in itself always presupposes that the most desirable is not alone. Moreover, we fell in love (ie, suffer the cathexis) of freedom but the first thing we demand and demand is security, which clearly does not exist, repeating the pattern will not be happy but I have a husband (or weds) and forget couples closed who also risk tomorrow This continuing story. Forget that question open relationships, monogamy, a model which, as is well known, is very recent (about 200 years) and that comes from the hand and the service of capitalism [1] . In fact, in line with Armand and the couple or family are eligible to "develop the anarchist conception of life. The family is a small state, even when parents are anarchists .... " As write Rossi, a journalist of the socialist community in the late nineteenth century and managed to settle the anarchist community project in Brazil called Colonia Cecilia "Change rites and the names as we want ... but while we have a man, a woman, a hijxs, a house, we have a family, a small company that is authoritarian, jealous of its prerogatives .... " As we see, we have regressed enough boxes when nuestrxs anarchists today are no longer as concerned issues such as alternative forms of power, and from art and sexuality.
But it is understood, this exploration of open relationships and all sexual practices and usually repressed it contained no means to experience a sort of secret joys and return home unscathed to pretend that nothing has happened, not convinced by the sexologist Alessandra Rampolla of "everything is normal", but rather the contrary, imports the "abnormal." Nor is it to emulate the swinger covenants that reinforce the idea of \u200b\u200bcouples, a two indissoluble where women are often used as a bargaining chip to gain access to new goods, ie where other women and erotic games between them are focused on warming partner only. Rather, it is unthinkable relations proposed subversive and rebellious social rearrangements that may already be trying, here now, pleasant, happy, and threateningly radical indecency given regulated country within the community itself, and reproduces reorganization models the sex of the traditional bourgeois heterosexual family, without being aware of it, a kind of false consciousness of gender. Because, besides "love love may also include, above all, the happiness of one who loves" or does not say that our freedom Bakunin and multiplies otrxs free vegan. In love, as in everything else, "is only what destroys wealth of jealousy and envy" [2] .
But I know that "saying yes to sex is not to say no to power," becoming a sexual insurgent trying to lift barriers to the boiling of repressed impulses, in a relentless pursuit of many lovers as desirable people find my way. On the contrary, it is an intensification of pleasures, new ways of love, new relationships erotic resist the disciplining of sexuality and increase the pleasures and bodily pleasures to intervene and transform the reality. Effective resistance to the heteronormative productivity that has entered our lives with our approval and we have been deprived of life lovemaking more exciting, more extreme, more risk to achieve counterproductivity, which deliberately plays on the surfaces of our bodies with shapes or intensities of pleasure and enjoyment not covered, so to speak, by the authoritarian ratings up now we have issued authoritatively what sex is and what their sexuality.
The proposal is to think the body as a site of resistance against the construction biopolitics hypersexualization demanding forms of sexual functions total break with traditional forms of feminism standard, systematically deconstructing not only the desire but the sexual practices of gender system hegemonic, and the entire gender system. Counterproductivity, pleasure-namely, that makes us excited permanently out of production-reproduction chain (whether they be children, whether they practice, be it relationships, or things), always being aware that there is no pure sexuality - contrasexual not pure, "but what if you can have is discomfort and resistance, and that sexuality is not that nameless and less land, natural and merely unconscious or conscious pre worse, but the device from where the power with great power in its more naturalized state. Hence the need for full sexual consciousness (an insurgency), sexualizing the entire body surface, all fetishes and disidentified reproductive organs with sex organs (easily achievable task for the woman who knows since the mid-40, against reactionary vulgata and by J & J that the only possible orgasm is the clitoris is not part of the reproductive system [3] ).
And unfortunately, this practice of resistance, this sexual self-learning, construction and eroticism that you want to lead to greater wealth libidinal and destruction of social taboos, indicators of the socio-ideological repression and testimony of human alienation will not be carried on without effort, without conscience, without mutual support from other individuals and especially unwilling to get rid of gender privileges that clearly produce oppression and exclusion. As you may have noticed, do not believe in sex as a natural instinct, or as organ or as a practice. By contrast, according to Preciado and Foucault, think of it as a technology of domination heterosocial that reduces the body's erogenous zones according to a skewed distribution of gender and its expressions and disciplines. The heterosexual political system, in the words of Wittig, divide and fragment the body identified as focal areas of natural sexual difference. The roles and practices that are attributed to the male gender is an arbitrary set of rules inscribed in the bodies that ensure the material exploitation of one sex over another favoring the penis (a type of penis with certain steps and certain practices and not others ) a privileged place of intercourse, and subtracting from now, creativity, and of course, pleasure, a refuge for our freedom, being a perversion, in an opinion a bit rushed, a bastion of resistance, as quoted out of context, unproductive sexuality exposes another disciplinatoria sexuality as hetero ideology.
"hard? Certainly, like all struggles. Impossible? No way. No doubt anti-hegemonic sexualities and relationships and bonds of affinity ranks first they are desirable and necessary to live today as we would like to live tomorrow.
As I believe there can be no division between life praxis and ideas, I'll start talking about me, because that forms part of what society would call" my private life "is actually a strong political commitment to the established order of things, which I hope will be destroyed at any time by the actions of other individuals like me. And beginning with the autobiographical tone because I think that we have not overcome the texts and the productions of scholars like Foucault or Butler Preciado about sexuality, but if it is time to put the body literally the case, and let to play the hidden sexuality, being as it is that the division by gender, qualification by gender expressions, and the exercise of sexuality that there is clear and "natural" are at least one of the pillars where the system is strongly supported playing the system we have today. However, my interest is not to prescribe how one should live in a future anarchist society, but try to find hic et nunc, from my own personal experience based on the intersection with other individuals, ways to subvert, dismantle and destroy the system as far as my concerns me (for taste) and more challenges me. I
Leonor. I have 32 years. I have sex with women from age 12, and males from the 15. I have three male lovers, and a female lover, not all these people live in my city, my longest relationship has been 8 years, and that person is the only one that I call family, and I want the other 3 also someday are, I think we walked to the affinity. And "I have" in this context means having a car, a house or a pair of slippers, it means giving my life (my body) to others with all our contradictions and weaknesses. These 4 people know about the others, some of them are known and are in turn love between them. Cojo
all I can, with any person who I like and want to catch me. And But those who know me know that I am anything but a friend of smiles, which Venus, kind or sympathetic. My idea is not released the girl always ready, but the activist who makes his shell a barricade because he knows that, in part, the vulva is one of the best things that get learned. Take to me is not just penetration, but being penetrated by the body, fists, dildos, vibrators, as well as penetrating my lovers is something we usually practice with extreme pleasure. We talked a lot about sex, fantasies and desires, as well as other policy issues around which the activists congregate. Whenever I can also try to have group sex (especially swingers nightclubs not) plus sadomasochistic practices of all kinds enjoy being sexually submissive or subjecting others with all manner of perversions, some of which include either pain or humiliation of some kind. I see sadomasochism as a work of art that is so much more exciting when it is prohibited. My practice S / M parody often politically hegemonic sexualities. Sadomasochism is the most extreme sexual experience: when sex becomes most purely sexual, the further away of love, anatomical reduction and romantic discipline. The S / M is the quintessence of sex without reproductive purposes: to create strange pleasure forms. Also explored enough exhibitionism and the sexualization of public space, and work on the citation deviant sexual conventions allows sexualized (and so resemantizing) such as jealousy (or does not it remains privately owned). Not my body or my sexuality, I feel shame, and masturbation and auto-eroticism is an excellent opportunity for my sex life. My life is like that of muchxs, full of contradictions to be overcome, but not double-talk, false consciousness, or hypocrisy.
not usually found in the anarchist movement (and only discuss otrxs ellxs because vegan activists and movements are even worse in regard to sexuality) or lovers or sex related, but That does not surprise me, not usually found in the anarchist movement, beyond some honorable exceptions, rather than playing themselves what they want to abolish, or were supposed to algunxs wanted: young married couples who had a child by an oversight, and now charge with that, long engagements with sexuality romanticoides unsatisfactory and where she always believed in a concept so slavish and restrictive for their own freedom and emancipation as "eternal love" and where he is able to say things like "we can do whatever you want but she does not realize the damage because "moralists of all kinds, all colors essentialist motherhood holding as a destination for women, couples unequal gender roles, penetrative sexual and reproductive functions, etc.
The picture is, to say the least, bleak. We're not even where we had left the anarchist Emma Goldman in the early past century reminds us that love can only be free, that love dies with the marriage, and if by some mystery survives after getting married, it was not the marriage. Of course Emma was referring to heterosexuals in a time where it was virtually impossible for a woman or a man, evade their civic and social responsibility to marry and enter, thus the system of capitalist production and reproduction which the anarcho-feminist opposed. And the reality is that today there is no longer much difference between going through the church or registry office and living with family ties faux marriage, but we want self-deceiving. In fact the couple, even a couple who freely choose to be mutual and state-blessed - as I thought Emma Goldman would be the link between two human beings who love, "is an institution in itself always presupposes that the most desirable is not alone. Moreover, we fell in love (ie, suffer the cathexis) of freedom but the first thing we demand and demand is security, which clearly does not exist, repeating the pattern will not be happy but I have a husband (or weds) and forget couples closed who also risk tomorrow This continuing story. Forget that question open relationships, monogamy, a model which, as is well known, is very recent (about 200 years) and that comes from the hand and the service of capitalism [1] . In fact, in line with Armand and the couple or family are eligible to "develop the anarchist conception of life. The family is a small state, even when parents are anarchists .... " As write Rossi, a journalist of the socialist community in the late nineteenth century and managed to settle the anarchist community project in Brazil called Colonia Cecilia "Change rites and the names as we want ... but while we have a man, a woman, a hijxs, a house, we have a family, a small company that is authoritarian, jealous of its prerogatives .... " As we see, we have regressed enough boxes when nuestrxs anarchists today are no longer as concerned issues such as alternative forms of power, and from art and sexuality.
But it is understood, this exploration of open relationships and all sexual practices and usually repressed it contained no means to experience a sort of secret joys and return home unscathed to pretend that nothing has happened, not convinced by the sexologist Alessandra Rampolla of "everything is normal", but rather the contrary, imports the "abnormal." Nor is it to emulate the swinger covenants that reinforce the idea of \u200b\u200bcouples, a two indissoluble where women are often used as a bargaining chip to gain access to new goods, ie where other women and erotic games between them are focused on warming partner only. Rather, it is unthinkable relations proposed subversive and rebellious social rearrangements that may already be trying, here now, pleasant, happy, and threateningly radical indecency given regulated country within the community itself, and reproduces reorganization models the sex of the traditional bourgeois heterosexual family, without being aware of it, a kind of false consciousness of gender. Because, besides "love love may also include, above all, the happiness of one who loves" or does not say that our freedom Bakunin and multiplies otrxs free vegan. In love, as in everything else, "is only what destroys wealth of jealousy and envy" [2] .
But I know that "saying yes to sex is not to say no to power," becoming a sexual insurgent trying to lift barriers to the boiling of repressed impulses, in a relentless pursuit of many lovers as desirable people find my way. On the contrary, it is an intensification of pleasures, new ways of love, new relationships erotic resist the disciplining of sexuality and increase the pleasures and bodily pleasures to intervene and transform the reality. Effective resistance to the heteronormative productivity that has entered our lives with our approval and we have been deprived of life lovemaking more exciting, more extreme, more risk to achieve counterproductivity, which deliberately plays on the surfaces of our bodies with shapes or intensities of pleasure and enjoyment not covered, so to speak, by the authoritarian ratings up now we have issued authoritatively what sex is and what their sexuality.
The proposal is to think the body as a site of resistance against the construction biopolitics hypersexualization demanding forms of sexual functions total break with traditional forms of feminism standard, systematically deconstructing not only the desire but the sexual practices of gender system hegemonic, and the entire gender system. Counterproductivity, pleasure-namely, that makes us excited permanently out of production-reproduction chain (whether they be children, whether they practice, be it relationships, or things), always being aware that there is no pure sexuality - contrasexual not pure, "but what if you can have is discomfort and resistance, and that sexuality is not that nameless and less land, natural and merely unconscious or conscious pre worse, but the device from where the power with great power in its more naturalized state. Hence the need for full sexual consciousness (an insurgency), sexualizing the entire body surface, all fetishes and disidentified reproductive organs with sex organs (easily achievable task for the woman who knows since the mid-40, against reactionary vulgata and by J & J that the only possible orgasm is the clitoris is not part of the reproductive system [3] ).
And unfortunately, this practice of resistance, this sexual self-learning, construction and eroticism that you want to lead to greater wealth libidinal and destruction of social taboos, indicators of the socio-ideological repression and testimony of human alienation will not be carried on without effort, without conscience, without mutual support from other individuals and especially unwilling to get rid of gender privileges that clearly produce oppression and exclusion. As you may have noticed, do not believe in sex as a natural instinct, or as organ or as a practice. By contrast, according to Preciado and Foucault, think of it as a technology of domination heterosocial that reduces the body's erogenous zones according to a skewed distribution of gender and its expressions and disciplines. The heterosexual political system, in the words of Wittig, divide and fragment the body identified as focal areas of natural sexual difference. The roles and practices that are attributed to the male gender is an arbitrary set of rules inscribed in the bodies that ensure the material exploitation of one sex over another favoring the penis (a type of penis with certain steps and certain practices and not others ) a privileged place of intercourse, and subtracting from now, creativity, and of course, pleasure, a refuge for our freedom, being a perversion, in an opinion a bit rushed, a bastion of resistance, as quoted out of context, unproductive sexuality exposes another disciplinatoria sexuality as hetero ideology.
"hard? Certainly, like all struggles. Impossible? No way. No doubt anti-hegemonic sexualities and relationships and bonds of affinity ranks first they are desirable and necessary to live today as we would like to live tomorrow.
Leonor Silvestri
leocatlove@gmail.com
http://www.leomiau76.blogspot.com/
http://www.anarcopervertismo.blogspot.com/
http://www.proyectilfetal.blogspot.com/
leocatlove@gmail.com
http://www.leomiau76.blogspot.com/
http://www.anarcopervertismo.blogspot.com/
http://www.proyectilfetal.blogspot.com/
[1] With this I am not implying that all past and cultures there was free love and women.
[2] "The love between anarchist, E. Armand in free love, Eros and Anarchy Baigorria Osvaldo (ed.)
[3] people probably prehistoric societies were able to have these two sides split largely due to the phenomenon known as parthenogenesis, where you know what was the intervention of man in the reproduction of the species, and therefore was completely secular sexuality from reproduction.
0 comments:
Post a Comment